E-mail the Scoop at scoopmontana@gmail.com

Thursday, November 1, 2007

The Unsinkable Roy Brown

The Scoop came out of his sugar-induced coma today to attend the announcement tour of Montana Republican gubernatorial candidate Roy Brown, who criss-crossed the state introducing himself to voters.

While I have admired Brown from afar for years, I have never really met or heard him speak, except for an informative, yet brief, talk he gave during the 2005 legislative session.

His presentation was too short to make much of an impression, and sandwiched into a series of legislative updates that were poorly planned and executed. (Not unlike the ASUM-MontPIRG debate the other night on campus, except that Brown was speaking at a non-partisan event, not paid for by state money.)

I remember being impressed that he could prevail over the terrible format, much like our mainstream city council candidates did on campus the other night. (Bravo!)

So, I approached today with both great hope and trepidation, attending mainly due to the coverage Brown has received from his level-headed hometown blog, Montana Headlines.

Like most Montanans, the Scoop has been frustrated of late. It seems that outside of Rehberg, and since Racicot, Montana Republicans have lacked smart and articulate candidates that can inspire both the rank-and-file AND mainsteam voters. Today I was half expecting a dud, but instead was inspired, energized and quite frankly, surprised.

While the Scoop believes Republicans have a built-in advantage with Montana voters, they need a strong candidate to attract the independents and conservative democrats necessary to build a mainstream coalition. Roy Brown has that appeal, and is everything you would expect in a would-be governor.

Brown is bright, energetic, visionary, and an talented communicator. He is approachable and funny...an everyday kind of guy. He has a tremendous knowledge of the diversity, history and challenges of our state. Brown also has a tested political strength, having been the target of a left-wing, $100k spending offensive that tried to take him out during his last legislative run (the most expensive in the state) .

The result: Brown spent one-third the amount of his Schweitzer funded and backed opponent... and won handily...in a district that leans democrat.

Brown is also everything that our current governor is not: a gentleman, classy, civil and humble. He is style AND substance. He is what our current governor promised to be during his last campaign, but somehow forgot on his way to the statehouse.

Brown is quite simply the anti-Schweitzer, at least when compared to the one that governs.

No wonder they were trying to sink this guy!

To top it off, Roy Brown has a spot-on message: Schweitzer has recklessly increased state spending by over 40%, putting Montana's economic recovery at risk and setting the state up for inevitable future tax increases, all without fixing any of our substantive challenges like children's health care and education.

And, unlike the mainstream Montana media, Brown is not afraid to call Schweitzer out on his long list of unkept promises, such as his election-time commitment to make state government "leaner and meaner." Instead, our governor has increased state spending by $40,000 for every Montana family of four, and has hired over 1,000 employees into the very departments he once claimed needed the heavy hand of an efficiency seeking manager.

But, as I hear is typical Brown fare, his focus today was not on our failed governor, but on his own qualifications and vision for Montana. In short, he promised four things:

1. To promote Montana over himself. (So long, Jag!)

2. To focus his efforts on long-term property tax relief and elimination of the equipment tax.

3. To raise our campaign finance grade from an "F" to something more deserving of Montana voters.

4. To replace the out of control spending frenzy that dominates Helena with more responsible fiscal management.
Brown also showed off his civility and class. Rather than having Schweitzer read about his challenge in the newspaper, Brown felt compelled to call his office and speak to the governor personally. Unfortunately, and is often the case, Schweitzer was on an out-of-state trip, so Brown did the following...

"I left a message to tell the governor that I will run an honest and spirited campaign and that I will avoid any negative, personal attacks."

A message we are sure that our current governor will be eager to return...in the form of multiple 30-60 second hit pieces paid by for by his well-heeled, out-of-state buddies.

But, the Scoop thinks he may have met his match in the unassuming yet accomplished Roy Brown. If we tune off his last political dual with Schweitzer, he may just be the unsinkable Roy Brown.

21 comments:

Shane C. Mason said...

"I left a message to tell the governor that I will run an honest and spirited campaign and that I will avoid any negative, personal attacks."

Too bad you didn't get that message very well. Look at this:

Brown is also everything that our current governor is not: a gentleman, classy, civil and humble.

Funny how everyone on the left managed to write Brown's entrance up with a tone of encouragement, but you came off as bitter sounding a lot less happy with Brown than angry at Schweitzer. If that isn't a personal attack, I don't know what is.

Scoop Montana said...

Shane - I'm critical of the governor because I think he has implemented policies that are fiscally irresponsible, bad for Montana's economic future and vastly out of step with the promises he made as a candidate. I also feel his leadership style and partisan nature have contributed to the civility issue we have had in state government. That's all I write about here.

I'm not alone, as countless individuals across the state have made these same claims (even some Democrats, in the newspaper!). This doesn't make someone bitter; just of a different opinion.

It's not a personal attack to talk about a candidate’s record, or their methods, and to contrast these with their campaign promises. That is what an election is all about.

If you or anyone on the left have a problem with his, you have acquired it since the Burns race. I'm not even going to waste my time searching the web for examples of the civility the left demonstrated during that campaign.

I'm glad you are encouraged, but I am sure my exuberance about Brown is a little more lasting and authentic than yours. But, being the optimist that I am, I'm open to surprises.

If you are still as 'encouraged' about Brown as we get closer to the election, I'll let you run your endorsement post here at the Scoop.

Just try to keep it under 1500 words. And no rabbit ears.

Bunnies and border collies are OUT this year.

Shane C. Mason said...

It's not a personal attack to talk about a candidate’s record, or their methods, and to contrast these with their campaign promises.

No, its not, but saying that the Governor is not a gentleman, is not classy and is not civil has nothing to do with talking about a candidates record. That is called a personal attack. Plain and simple.

If you are still as 'encouraged' about Brown as we get closer to the election, I'll let you run your endorsement post here at the Scoop.

I never said that I 'endorsed' Brown, I said it would be good for the system. Maybe if you ventured past the confines of your own little blog, you would know what had been said.

Scoop Montana said...

It is not my fault that he has behaved in a way that even well-known Democrats, the Missoula Independent and the mainstream press has roundly, and publically, criticized.

You can cry foul, but this is an issue, however you want to characterize it. I did not put this on the table, the governor himself has, due to his own lack of humility.

carol said...

Roy Brown is a very nice man, a real gentleman. I can't think of a better candidate and I'm glad he decided to jump into the race.

Colby Natale said...

Scoop, are you actually impressed with Brown for his own personal qualities, or just because you believe that he makes Schweitzer beatable?

Scoop Montana said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Scoop Montana said...

Colby - I am impressed by both equally. Brown easily stands on his own in any race, but more positively when compared to his opponent...regardless of issues, record or personality.

Elections are comparisons, and comparing well is what makes a GOOD candidate a GREAT one.

Pundits have to be changing their minds. While the odds are still long, Brown is one of a handful of folks that put this race in play.

The only thing missing is money. I bet he already knows how to raise 500k of the 1.5 million needed. The rest will come when donors see this winning combination.

I'm also eager to see who he picks as a running mate. I hope it is a strong person that can put a traditional swing county in play.

The odds are that things are only going to get better for Brown...and my bet is that Shane's mood of encouragement will cave something soon (if it didn't already overnight).

Shane C. Mason said...

Scoop, when you make one's honor an 'issue', you have passed out of the realm of real policy discussion and stepped into the realm of negative politics. Saying that someone is not a gentleman and has no class is negative politics.

Matt Singer said...

That on-campus debate wasn't co-sponsored by Forward Montana. One of our organizers attended on his own time and asked a question.

Our forum was Candidates Gone Wild, which was non-partisan and hosted without state money.

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

"Saying that someone is not a gentleman and has no class is negative politics."

Not when it is the truth.

Anonymous said...

Liberals like Mason gives better than they take. Just like the gov. Dont worry about it Scoop as you are on the mark. If libs really want to focus on the issues they would address the ones you present, which are many. Mason should be a professional wrestler. He can fall down even when there is no punch.

Anonymous said...

God forbid 'The Scoop' should check a fact or two. I don't see a retraction of the lie about Forward Montana in his post.

Scoop Montana said...

I removed the mention of Forward, but deeply question the revolving door relationships between the three organizations I mention.

This entire string of comments cracks me up. The left can only point out issues where the Scoop went on a wild tangent from Brown (which, I have a tendency to do)...they can't even address the main point of the entire post.

Maybe opposition research hasn't faxed over the talking points yet.

Anonymous said...

lefty montana bloggers lack anyone that delivers as clear an analysis as the scoop.

p.s. your tangental comments are both accurate and funny. keep them coming

Scoop Montana said...

Anon - Thanks for the kudos. I enjoy my occassional writing here at the Scoop.

Today is a particularly heavy day, with over 300 folks here to read about Roy Brown. I haven't seen this much interest since my posts about global warming. But, I have laid down the pen for most the week - writing a blog can get tiring. The Brown story got me off the couch.

Some days I only attract my mother, so getting more than 100 people is always fun. Of course, based on your comments, I thought you might be her.

But, like my wife, she is an excellent copy editor (something I am not). She would point out that maybe you meant TANGENTIAL.

Anyways, you are always welcome at the Scoop. And it is nice to know you are not my mother, or my wife.

goof houlihan said...

I'm not a relative either and I supported my friend Bob Brown for Governor four years ago, and nothing's ever changed my mind in that regard...although many a Republican has cause to regret their votes in the primary.

This Brown won't have a blonde former governor to carry around on his back on the campaign trail. So the Gov won't be able to hide, and pop up once in a while and yell "Judy Martz" and then disappear again.

Still, Schweitzer articulates a vision, and the new Brown hasn't produced a vision that is going to inspire a sea change in his direction.

Republicans are correct in their assertions that government is usually the least efficient method of getting anything done.

But the whole "fewer property taxes on Ted Turner and Stan Kroenke and Burlington Northern" isn't the way to go about it.

Quality of life issues start with the ability to earn a living, put a roof over your head and food on the table, send kids to school, and not go bankrupt paying for health insurance. Start there, what are the at the supper table issues?

As for negative campaigning, well, we've got the lefty bloggers campaign against John Morrison to point to. Before you lecture Scoop, you might want to check the poop on your shoe from that primary.

Scoop Montana said...

Goof - good post. I think you articulate Brown's biggest challenge - how to overcome the Schweitzer pubilicty machine and the general (although I think horribly uniformed) good feeling.

Wasn't blogging during the last primary, so no poop here, but does not mean I won't step in it this year.

Morrison fell victim to the same thing traditional democrats in Missoula face - they are being purged from power by an increasingly progressive left wing. I wouldn't have piled on Morrison, as I think progressives are wrecking traditional Montana.

It appears to me that Montana is more conservative vs. liberal than Republican vs. Democrat. Unfortunately, Schweitzers record is one of big government liberalism...nothing fiscally conservative about it.

It may take a big stumble by the gov to really open up this race, but the underlying problems that topple incumbants are there.

goof said...

Hey Scoop that last paragraph wasn't "Before you lecture, Scoop"

it was a comment to Shane, et all,

Before you deserve a lecture, Scoop, there's the Morrison primary to review, eh?


Hope that clarifies that.

Scoop Montana said...

Scoop <--- not the sharpest observer of punctuation.

Anonymous said...

The governor's supporters complain that Brown's "Workhorse not a showhorse" criticism is a personal attack. But it is very much a criticism of performance in office when the governor is using the taxpayers' dime and the taxpayers' time for trips to Hollywood, San Francisco, New York and beyond to spread his fame and raise money. Brown's comment is a succinct way of summing up one of the big problems with this administration.